sma comment

In The Wall Street Journal’s The Big Interview with Kelly Evans, Alan Greenspan talks at length about his view on the economy and stock market.  He also says he wouldn’t have done anything different given what he knows now.

SMA Comment:  I’m reading Matt Taibbi’s “Griftopia,” specifically the chapter entitled “The Biggest Asshole in the Universe.”  Evan’s excellent interview does nothing to dispel Taibbi’s assessment of  “The Maestro.”  Kelly Evans is supposedly only 23 years old and was the most impressive thing in this interview, although we can only hope we have the same lucidity of Greenspan when we’re 84.
***

{ 0 comments }

Derek Hernquist Doesn’t Get the Need to Predict

by Barron Maestro on January 8, 2011

Derek Hernquist, writer of the “Musings of a Tape Reader” blog, is critical of the constant predictions spouted by the pundits. He singles out Doug Kass, while acknowledging he has made great calls in the past, wonders why he makes predictions at all.

Hernquist points out several factors weighing on the bullish and bearish sides of the scale. One thing in particular that disturbs him as far as a continued bullish run in the market that I found interesting:

1) Breadth- I find it odd that on this run to new highs we’ve failed to see even 70% of stocks above their 10 day average. This is VERY disappointing, and is evidence of a narrowing market rather than broadening…and NOT due to the bond market weakness, as I measure this using names that trade actively and with decent range.

SMA Comment: Predictions are made by pundits to keep their names in the popular media. Most predictions are probably best ignored as no one has shown a particular skill in this regard. However, Doug Kass is probably one of the more accurate predictors out there, although he is far from perfect.

Source: Derek Hernquist
***

{ 0 comments }

The Market Thoroughly Convinces Investors to be Optimistic

by Barron Maestro on December 26, 2010

Paul J. Lim, senior editor at Money Magazine, has written an article published in The N. Y. Times revealing that investors made decent returns by taking on more risk in the past decade:

Risk-taking hasn’t been rewarded over just the last 18 months. Despite all the talk about what a “lost decade” this has been for investors, risky asset classes have actually produced sizable gains over the last 10 years. For instance, though the average fund that invests in large-capitalization domestic stocks gained just 1.5 percent, annualized, in that period, small-stock funds returned nearly 7 percent a year. And emerging-market stock funds returned nearly 15 percent, annualized, during that stretch, according to Morningstar.

Risk-taking was also well rewarded in the fixed-income markets. While safe government bond funds gained 4.8 percent, on average, for the past decade, slightly riskier investment-grade corporate bond funds gained 5.4 percent, annualized, and high-yield bond funds — even riskier — returned nearly 7 percent a year.

Lim goes on to point out that the easy money has likely been made and investor optimism may be unwarranted:

INDEED, some market strategists worry that investor optimism itself may be a headwind to another strong year for the market. Consider how stocks performed in other recent periods of optimism. In October 2007, a survey by the American Association of Individual Investors found that 55 percent of investors were bullish; in the 12 months that followed, the S.& P. 500 fell 37 percent. Similarly, in March 2000, investor bullishness reached 66 percent. And a year after the fact, stocks were down 25 percent.

It just goes to show that by the time the market thoroughly convinces investors to be optimistic, most of the good news is already behind us.

SMA Comment: The market’s strength despite downright humdrum economic news is encouraging for the coming year. It is surprising, given all the problems we have now (i.e., exploding deficits, municipalities on the brink, housing in the dumper), that investors are exhibiting such high levels of bullish sentiment. It appears the biggest factor influencing sentiment is simply the market moving to higher ground. I’m expecting some short-term disappointment (cratering stock prices) to bring investors back to reality.  However, once this price correction of perhaps 4-7% is completed, sending sentiment to more reasonable readings, stocks will probably make their way to higher ground.

Source: The N. Y. Times
***

{ 0 comments }

The Case for Japanese Stocks

by Barron Maestro on December 16, 2010

Christopher Pavese, writer of the blog, “The View from the Blue Ridge,” touts the virtues of Japanese stocks. Pavese underscores the futility investors have faced investing in the Nikkei index over the past 20+ years:

The Spectacular Japanese Secular Bear Market kicked off in 1989 with the bursting of economic history’s largest real estate bubble. More than two decades later, the Japan Bear has lasted twice as long as any other secular bear market on record. A twenty year economic landscape branded by zombie banks, frightened management, bridges to nowhere, repeated bouts of deflation and broad-based despair has wreaked havoc on investor confidence. It’s hard to blame them as the country has been trapped in recession for 102 of the 239 months through yearend 2009. That’s a solid ten points better than Ted William’s .344 career batting average!

Pavese’s argument for higher prices is quite simple:

The predictable result is that Japanese Households despise equities, preferring the “safety” of domestic government bonds. As illustrated above, only 4% of Japanese household assets are invested in equities today [Pavese has an interesting pie chart at the link below]. In other words, there is plenty of room for upside, even before we consider the fact that Japanese assets are extremely underrepresented across global institutional portfolios as well.

Confidence levels clearly make the case that the Japan Bear is approaching a secular low and may have started a bottoming process. The Nikkei’s first decade of underperformance has been followed by a decade-long basing pattern. Technicians would point to any upside breakout from such an extended base as an indication of much higher prices to come.

Experience has taught us that calling major secular turning points in any market is difficult at best, so we prefer to leg into investments over time as long as we have an appropriate margin of safety. With many Japanese securities trading below book value, and even below cash value, we believe the risk-reward in buying Japan today appears very attractive. The trade would feel even more attractive with the identification of potential catalysts.

SMA Comment: Several individuals posted comments arguing that due to Japan’s poor demographic profile (the population is aging) and substantial debt at all levels the country is not attractive for investment. My opinion is that Japan has some great companies with substantial global sales and strong balance sheets, therefore, any problems isolated to the home country can be overcome and is no reason to avoid these stocks.

Source:Business Insider
***

{ 2 comments }

David Winters Says to Look Globally

by Barron Maestro on December 15, 2010

David Winters was on CNBC this week giving his view of the current investment landscape in a short interview with Maria Bartiromo.  Winters previously worked with the famed value manager Michael Price of the Mutual Series of funds, when he managed the Mutual Discovery fund.

SMA Comment:  If I were to buy an actively managed fund, David Winters would definitely be one of my top choices as a fund manager.

{ 1 comment }

Pitfalls of High Dividend Stock Investing

by Barron Maestro on December 7, 2010

Larry Swedroe, author of numerous investing books, points out that investing in stocks paying high dividends is no substitute for a good fixed income strategy or a diversified stock approach.

While the financial media touts high-dividend stocks strategies as alternatives to other prudent investment strategies — such as equity strategies or high-quality fixed income portfolios — there are several issues you should consider. First, a high-dividend strategy is far riskier than a high-quality fixed income approach, so comparing the two is like comparing apples to oranges.

Second, a high-dividend strategy is essentially a value stock strategy, which involves buying companies that have low prices relative to earnings, book value, dividends or some other accounting metric. However, the high-dividend approach to a value stock strategy has historically had the lowest returns, and returns (meaning dividend payments plus capital appreciation) are ultimately what should matter.

Swedroe goes on to show that using the high dividend approach for investing in value stocks is a poor substitute in producing risk adjusted returns compared to three other strategies over the period 1952-2009; 1) low price to book value, 2) low price to earnings, and 3) low price to cash flow.

SMA Comment:  Dividend paying stocks have been popularized in the media over the past couple of years.  This is partly due to the low interest rates available on certificates of deposit and money market funds.  Anytime something becomes as popular as dividend-paying stocks seem to be right now, investors should be wary.  However, there are a substantial number of stable companies that pay a modest dividend that will probably never be cut and will likely increase over time.  This is where investors should concentrate when looking for alternatives in this area.  Several attractive stocks with above average yields currently are Abbott Labs (ABT), Clorox (CLX) and Lilly (LLY).

Source: Moneywatch
***

{ 0 comments }

Active Managers Are Doing Horribly

December 4, 2010

Jeff Cox, CNBC staff writer at NetNet, reports on the dismal results obtained by active money managers this year. Despite the stock market’s relatively robust performance in 2010, this has been a bad year for active managers—in fact, as bad as it’s ever been. Just one in four beat their benchmarks for the year, according to [...]

Read More →

Perhaps a Safer Way to Play Emerging Markets

November 30, 2010

Daniel Fisher has written an article for Forbes highlighting several domestic stocks with large international sales exposure.  Fisher indicates that investing in U. S. based stocks is probably safer than going overseas. Forget about buying shares in emerging markets companies and rolling the dice on their murky accounting and governance standards. Instead, consider tapping into [...]

Read More →

The Dismal Performance of Commodity ETFs

November 24, 2010

Izabella Kaminska, writing for the Financial Times, reports on the issue of rollover and contango decay in commodity exchange traded products in her article, “Commodity ETFs: even worse than you thought.” For example, looking at the following chart, readers can see a clear underperformance in the USO ETF versus a straight rolling WTI futures position [...]

Read More →

Just About Everything You Wanted to Know About the Efficient Market Hypothesis

November 17, 2010

Philip S. Russel and Violet M. Torbey, both academics, have written an extensive article on the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). Russel and Torbey describe the three recognized forms of EMH: First, what do we mean by an Efficient Market Hypothesis? The simplest explanation would be that securities prices reflect information. Fama (1970) made a distinction [...]

Read More →